More Than Meets The Mogwai

Friday, March 20, 2009

Auteurs and TV -- Incident at a Corner (Alfred Hitchcock, 1960)


Hitchcock’s sole foray into color for episodic television came with the hour-long variety series “Ford Startime”; it was filmed roughly a week after PSYCHO and aired the same year on April 5, 1960.


Centering on a nasty, untrue rumor that works overtime in North Hollywood (a street sign for Radford Ave. is prominently displayed in the titular occurrence, see below), Hitchcock opens Charlotte Armstrong’s story in an inventive way: by showing the rather simple event of a woman disobeying a manned traffic sign from vastly different vantage points, revealing a second set of observers only in the third cinematic re-telling. It’s the explicit antithesis of RASHOMON as the events stay the same; just one solitary detail’s been occluded from the overall picture.


Angle on Incident # 2 (#3, below, to the left).


The incident, as recounted, has to do with a well-heeled, “officious” woman, Mrs. Tawley (Leora Dana), as she ignores an elderly crossing guard, James Medwick (Paul Hartman) and his outstretched, flailing arms protesting her to stop in order to allow a teacher, Grimes (Jerry Paris), to safely pass. She’s late to her PTA meeting, and so ignores Medwick’s proclamations; Grimes doesn’t seem to mind either way, instead commentating warily to Medwick about her official position for the school. The two shrug it off once she exits.


Hitchcock lets us observe this exchange play out three times in unhurried long-shots that move into mediums, with the audio being identical each time. Firstly, he focuses on the car as it reaches its parking spot; secondly, Hitch favors the jaunty stroll of Grimes, using a conveniently placed stop sign to obscure the mysterious second parties and their automobile, and thirdly, across the street as the middle-aged man, Harry (Jack Albertson), looks on. His companion, an older redhead whose name we later learn is Georgia (Eve McVeagh), rushes into their home, undetected and clearly concerned as to whether the participants in the minor scuffle have noticed her. They haven’t.


Fade out, and commercial break.


Pat (Peppard) and Jean (Miles) interview Grimes (Paris), a teacher.

Once Mr. Medwick arrives home, we’re introduced to what will become the unofficial detectives of the piece, soon-to-be-married couple (and Medwick’s daughter) Jean (Vera Miles) and Pat Laurence (George Peppard). As a wry nod to Hitchcock’s playful device of re-showing the incident times three, Jean is a geometry tutor, going over mathematical angles with Ron (Warren Berlinger), the teenaged son of Mrs. Tawley. A phone call is placed by the latter, all off-screen, demanding Ron to leave for home and to sever ties with Jean’s skillful tutoring. Jean’s naturally upset by this unforeseen turn-of-events, figuring a misunderstanding somewhere, but Pat comforts her with notions that everybody gets fired, sooner or later.


Later that night, during the course of a birthday celebration for Mr. Medwick, also attended by other relatives (Bob Sweeney, Alice Backes) and Medwick’s good-natured wife, Elsa (Charity Grace), principal Rigsby (Wendell Holmes) lands on the family porch to drop a bombshell: a note’s been found in Mrs. Tawley’s automobile, accusing the elder Medwick of being a “vicious old man” fond of “little girls”.


The rest of the episode adapts to Jean and Pat in a series of talky sequences reminiscent of Simon Oakland’s psychological profile of Norman Bates at the close of PSYCHO. The two question Uncle Jeffrey (Sweeney)’s belief that it’s best that this untruth be best forgotten about, lest it cast a pale glimmer on his business or on Jean’s and Pat’s upcoming nuptials. Uncle Jeffrey figures the grandfatherly figure is old enough to move in with them, and quietly live out the rest of his years rather than fight a battle that’s been tainted with such unseemly accusations. Pat’s the one who spearheads an inquisition into the matter: learning of the spat that Medwick had with Mrs. Tawley from Grimes makes him assume that she’s responsible for the note. Corroborating with her is Mrs. Sinden (Hollis Irving), a hysterical mother with an overbearing, huffing-and-puffing husband, Sidney (Joe Flynn).



The piece de resistance in these lengthy dialogue back-and-forths is the frank discussion between Pat, Jean, Principal Rigsby and the President of the PDA, Mrs. Parker (Mary Alan Hokanson). Mrs. Parker’s phoniness is readily apparent, as she calmly suggests that Mr. Medwick’s theoretical pedophilia is “an illness” and, accordingly, “you must think of it that way”. She’s not keen on attempting to get to the bottom of the matter, preferring rote, unimaginative answers to actually questioning the validity of the accusations.


Even when Pat assumes he has Mr. and Mrs. Tawley over a barrel (their young son is caught spying and, accidentally, harms Jean), his lawyer suggests that he wouldn’t touch the case because Medwick’s on “the wrong side of social opinion”.

The actual note-writer is a bit of a cheat and is played for whimsy with a dramatic tonal shift from the otherwise tense scenario. One can infer that Hitchcock figured it a cheap trick: why else would he foreground the facts so closely in the opening scene(s)? We know who it is, but half the fun is watching Pat and Jean righteously assume the worst in everyone, clinging to straw man theories before the actualities are revealed almost accidentally by happenstance. Pat and Jean pigheadedly refrain from even considering the possibility that Medwick may not be innocent, and their forthrightness is something that Hitchcock obviously doesn’t condone: they’re guilty in their own way for following simple logistics without giving thought that the reality may be a tad more complicated.


Hitchcock manages to discuss such a disturbing issue in 1960 an evenhanded way – we all know what “fond of little girls” equals without getting into the indecent specifics (something a newer program like “Law and Order: SVU” has no problem in doing, week to week). Even more are the subtle suspicious actions from secondary characters, like Ron and Sidney: why does the former spy on the Medwick household, is he afraid of being found out for something similar to what Medwick’s been accused of? And Sidney’s unwillingness to speak to his daughter, coupled with his wife’s frenzied demeanor, could very well be interpreted in a different, more sinister way.


So far, a North American DVD has yet to be released with the episode, but “Incident” was collected in France in a box-set comprised entirely of the 17 Hitch-directed half-hours of “Presents”, the one “Hitchcock Hour” (“I Saw The Whole Thing” starring THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY and TOPAZ’s John Forsythe), and his solitary “Suspense” (“Four O’Clock” featuring E.G. Marshall and Harry Dean Stanton).


Paul Hartman as Mr. Medwick

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

Blogger jiang said...

The most memorable thomas sabo jewellery moment of life is engagement thomas jewellery occasion that comes in the pandora bracelets life of every people once in their lifetime. At this occasion, they pandora jewellery make promise to live together in every situation of the life and also pandora australia will share distress and blessed pandora bracelets moment of life together. There are a number pandora bracelet of questions popping in your mind that why only rings on engagement and not other jewelries pandora charms like earrings, locket and necklace. Answer thomas sabo australia is simple, the shape of ring is circular that define thomas sabo that love has neither beginning nor sabo jewellery end that why only rings are presented on engagement occasion.

6:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeder weiß, dass Diamanten thomas sabo sind für immer. Es ist nicht thomas sabo schmuck der Name des James-Bond-Film, sondern eine thomas sabo shop online bekannte Tatsache. Diese kostbaren Edelsteine thomas sabo preisvergleich sind zum letzten Generationen bekannt. Dieser Artikel thomas sabo preise beleuchtet dieses Mädchen, AOS bester Freund. Gute Diamanten thomas sabo Armband zeichnen sich durch ihre Fähigkeit, Licht zu thomas sabo Anhänger reflektieren Licht zurückzukehren oder beurteilt. Ein gut thomas sabo Halsschmuck geschliffener Diamant wird wie ein thomas sabo charms Feuerball strahlen, während eine falsch thomas sabo Kette geschliffenen Diamanten nicht haben in der thomas sabo 2010 erforderlichen es Funken. Bei der Auswahl thomassabo online shop der Diamanten in ein Juwelier.

11:39 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home